Putting
Baltimore Back Together Again
BELIEVE? – One Baltimore? – Don’t
Let This be a Warmed-over Version!!! – Part IV
This week, the Mayor
announced a campaign she's calling "One
Baltimore" to tackle persistent city ills. She stated, "This is
an opportunity for us to focus more intensely on systemic problems that have
faced our city for decades, if not generations". Further, she said, the city wants to partner
with philanthropic organizations, neighborhood groups and church leaders in the
effort.
At the news conference, it was also
stated by Mayor Rawlings-Blake that the "One Baltimore" campaign has no concrete
plans yet. I can only say at this point
if the mayor is truly considering systemic change to issues that have plagued
Baltimore for many, many, many decades then all of the cards on and under the
table must be in play!!! Please do not
let this be a replayed warmed-over version of the “Believe” campaign of Mayor
O’Malley!!! Since Mayor Schmoke’s
administration to the present day we currently have a combination of 47,000
vacant houses and lots in Baltimore!!! In other words, the efforts needed to
remedy the lack of deliberate and strategic investment in many communities requires
a minimum 20-year plan of totally re-arranged thinking from the business and
non-profit sectors. Additionally, all levels of government will need to revise
their policies and legislative enactment involving capital planning,
development and investment to embrace and actualize the executed New Vision of Urbanism in the City of Baltimore. To truly do this all of us will need to think Honestly,
Bold and BIG!!! It’s always done
in Caton, Federal Hill, Bolton Hill, Locust Point and Roland Park!!! Why not Sharp Leadenhall (oh sure, I’m aware of Caves Valley Partners
intent), Park Heights, Sandtown-Winchester, Harlem Park, Oliver, Pigtown
and Old Town? This work requires unambiguous
transparency, detail and collaboration similar to what is now being considered once
again on the Lexington Market’s 36 million
dollar facelift. Not like what was
done previously by the city’s lack of intent, details, collaborations and
resources on the 4 million dollar bust of the Lafayette Market re-opening!!!
While waiting for my 1st
cup of morning coffee at one vendor’s stall in the Lafayette Market, I still
hear the police officer yelling at 8:30 a.m., and shaking high in the air his
plastic handcuffs, “Ok, who’s ready to
get locked up this morning?” That greeting
doesn’t bode well at the start of a day anywhere! Everything in Baltimore other than the communities
previously mentioned, and others get detailed city/private sector collaboration
including community sustainability and real anchor planning assistance, public
safety and transportation enhancements along with infrastructure improvements!!! When will master plans in these communities
be seriously reviewed and executed with intent and good will? When will Bond
Issues be tied to development in these areas?
With these and other systemic corrections to current issues as stated by
Michael Cryor, the appointed head of One Baltimore suggested, "In the long
term, we believe truly changing the trajectory of a community will require a
comprehensive plan with multiple but complementary priorities”.
Now,
I don’t propose to be a mind reader, but let me promote what I think his
statement should mean regarding the execution of “One Baltimore”. In order to
“change the trajectory of a community”, there needs to be a contract or Memorandum
of Agreement (MOA) established where all
involved parties and cluster participants generally state their intentions,
responsibilities and commitments by signing the MOA. This MOA must also include the contracted and
real financial investment amounts of all
participants in the project. The MOA needs
to contain the phases required to cover the 20-year plan with essential sections
for all stakeholders to
include their specific intentions, responsibilities and commitments to the plan. Reflected in each stakeholder’s section should
be specific goals, strategies, activities, milestones, outcomes, evaluation
assessments and on-going report monitoring aligned with the major points
reflected in the MOA. Based on needs and results, financial infusion points
should line up with milestones as part of their commitment to financially
support the plan. Finally, to maintain
overall project transparency and alignment, an inclusion of Logic and Theory of
Change models encapsulating the necessary broad strokes of the project plan (inputs,
activities, & outcomes) expected to be accomplished and the important
details of change are required noting all that is needed to achieve the desired
result(s). The Theory of Change should align with inputs, activities and
outcomes. Good
logic models and a clearly expressed theory of change contribute to good evaluation
design, the last phase. Let’s see what resources, stakeholder
commitments and details will come out of One Baltimore. Anything resembling a warmed-over Believe
campaign is doomed prior to its start!!! Remember, to avert the warmed-over version, all cards, with Honesty,
Bold and BIG RESULTS!!!